language-icon Old Web
English
Sign In

Feeding order

In phonology and historical linguistics, feeding order is a situation in which rule A creates new contexts in which rule B can apply; it would not have been possible for rule B to apply otherwise. In phonology and historical linguistics, feeding order is a situation in which rule A creates new contexts in which rule B can apply; it would not have been possible for rule B to apply otherwise. If there are two rules, rule A which looks like x → y and rule B which looks like y → z, then the following is a feeding order: The opposite of feeding order, the situation in which rule A destroys a certain context so rule B can no longer apply, is called bleeding order. A good example of feeding order can be seen in English, where preglottalization can be considered as rule B. As a consequence of this rule, all voiceless plosives which make part of a word-final consonant cluster are glottalized. This can be seen in the form looked, with the underlying representation /lʊkt/. It is pronounced . Another rule in English which is called fortis stop insertion shall be considered here as rule A. This rule inserts a voiceless plosive for example in /prɪns/ (prince), so that the new form of the word becomes . Because a new phonological context has been created in which rule B can take place, the final output form of prince is . If the order of rules which are in feeding order is reversed, this is said to be a counterfeeding order. If we have two rules, rule A which looks like x → y and rule B which looks like y → z the following is a counterfeeding order: An example of this can be seen in French, where petite nièce ('little niece') is pronounced . If the rule which deletes word-final /-ə/ in French had been applied before another rule which deletes word-final consonants before another consonant, this would have been an example of feeding order and the 'final output' form (surface form) would have been instead. A counter-feeding order very often creates phonological opacity. In the given case, it is the application of the rule deleting word-final consonants which has thus become opaque in French. In historical linguistics, a sequence of rules in counterfeeding order is called a chain shift. A chain shift can be presented graphically like the following:

[ "Linguistics", "Chemical engineering", "Composite material", "Organic chemistry", "Inorganic chemistry" ]
Parent Topic
Child Topic
    No Parent Topic