On-site mercury analysis of soil at hazardous waste sites: by immunoassay and ASV

Abstract Two field methods for Hg, immunoassay and anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), that can provide onsite results for quick decisions at hazardous waste sites were evaluated. Each method was applied to samples from two Superfund sites that contain high levels of Hg; Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine site, Clear Lake, California, and Carson River Mercury site, Nevada. Two laboratory methods were used for comparison purposes; cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The immunoassay was found to be accurate for high and low Hg concentrations compared to the 5 and 15  μ g/g soil sample standards provided with it. Despite poor agreement between immunoassay and confirmatory analysis results at concentrations near the comparison standards, the immunoassay could be used as an effective screening method provided care is taken in identifying an operational screening level. The ASV method had an analytical range of 1–50  μ g/g, with a CV of 15%. ASV results were comparable to CVAFS (CV=15%) and more precise than ICP-MS (CV=20%). The lower limit of quantitative results was 3  μ g/g for field samples, and is attributed to uncertainty associated with sampling.