Prediction of Loneliness in Older Adults using Natural Language Processing: Exploring Sex Differences in Speech

2020 
Abstract Objective The growing pandemic of loneliness has great relevance to aging populations, though assessments are limited by self-report approaches. This paper explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to evaluate interviews on loneliness, notably, employing natural language processing (NLP) to quantify sentiment and features that indicate loneliness in transcribed speech text of older adults. Design Participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews regarding the experience of loneliness and a quantitative self-report scale (UCLA loneliness scale) to assess loneliness. Lonely and non-lonely participants (based on qualitative and quantitative assessments) were compared. Setting Independent living sector of a senior housing community in San Diego County. Participants 80 English-speaking older adults of ages 66-94 (mean 83 years). Measurements Interviews were audiotaped and manually transcribed. Transcripts were examined using NLP approaches to quantify sentiment and expressed emotions. Results Lonely individuals (by qualitative assessments) had longer responses with greater expression of sadness to direct questions about loneliness. Women were more likely to endorse feeling lonely during the qualitative interview. Men used more fearful and joyful words in their responses. Using linguistic features, machine learning models could predict qualitative loneliness with 94% precision (sensitivity=0.90, specificity=1.00) and quantitative loneliness with 76% precision (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.89). Conclusions Artificial intelligence (e.g., NLP and machine learning approaches) can provide unique insights into how linguistic features of transcribed speech data may reflect loneliness. Eventually linguistic features could be used to assess loneliness of individuals, despite limitations of commercially developed NLU programs.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    50
    References
    6
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []