A comparison of single‐voxel clinical in vivo hepatic 31P MR spectra acquired at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in health and diseased states

With the increasing availability of human MR scanners at various field strengths, the optimal field strength for in vivo clinical MR studies of the liver has become a focus of attention. Comparison between results at 3.0 and 1.5 T is of particular clinical interest, especially for multicentre studies. For MRS studies, higher field strengths should be advantageous, because improved sensitivity and chemical shift dispersion are expected. We report a comparison between single-voxel hepatic proton-decoupled 31P MRS performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T in the same subjects using similar methodologies. Twelve healthy volunteers and 15 patients with chronic liver disease were studied. Improved spectral resolution was achieved using proton decoupling, and there was an improvement (21%) in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the phosphomonoester (PME) resonance at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T. There was no significant change in nuclear Overhauser effects for PME or phosphodiesters (PDEs) between the two field strengths. The T1 value of PDE was significantly longer at 3 T, although there was no significant change in the T1 value of PME. There was no significant difference in the mean PME/PDE ratios for either the control or patient groups at both 1.5 and 3.0 T, but there was a small positive mean difference in PME/PDE at 3.0 T on pairwise testing between field strengths (+ 0.05, p < 0.01). There were significant correlations between PME/PDE values at the two magnetic field strengths (r = 0.806, p < 0.001). The underlying broad resonance was reduced at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T, related to line broadening of the phospholipid bilayer signal. In conclusion, there was an improvement in hepatic 31P MR signal quality at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T. Broadly similar hepatic 31P MR parameters were obtained at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The modest difference noted in the PME/PDE ratio between field strengths for patients with chronic liver disease should inform multicentre study design involving these field strengths. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.