The Principles of Administrative Law and the Jurisdiction of Choice in the UK

One of the most important debates in the field of competence is intended selective monitoring authority agrees, although some are selective about the monitoring of the constraints that are discussed. Under English law such as proportionality and reasonableness component and to monitor compliance with the goal of legislative competence has been selective. Competence and its implementation has always been one of the main concerns has been the administrative law scholars because it is always important place in the implementation of administrative rights. The public law principle of non-qualification, this means that the public's right to act granting general pessimistic view is at the discretion of bureaucrats. In addition to the historical reasons for this view, two major administrative origin and political opinion is one of respect for individual freedoms and the drives impede authorities to respect the lives of private individuals resort to the rule of law and other administrative requirements are involvement and competence are intertwined. The incapacity makes the kind of discipline within the competence created and interference is avoided in practice. So we should see the principles governing the exercise of jurisdiction (choice) is, and whether there is a possibility of judicial review of the discretionary power? And in the exercise of jurisdiction principles of the rule of law, proportionality and legitimate expectation applies, no doubt heavily general jurisdiction is subject to judicial review unless it expressly legislator to introduce ways to monitor inevitable. Monitoring as one of the fundamental issues of public law in the jurisdiction of choice much more important. Although, the public authority in this kind of authority greater freedom and initiative. This means decisions are not arbitrary. The main problem in the jurisdiction of choice, despite public authority the power to choose, how to monitor the implementation of this type of qualifications St.az purposes, requires the submission of discretion in the hands of administrators. Because of the complexity and administrative institutions to the extent that cannot be the competence of an administrative officer to each of predicted and described, there is a phenomenon called "competent authority" is not inevitable.