Influence of glass-ceramic coating on composite zirconia bonding and its characterization

Abstracts Objective The aims of this study were to compare micro-tensile bond strength and characterize the bond of ceramic-coated versus air-abraded and chemically treated zirconia specimens. Methods Eight zirconia blocks were fabricated and assigned to two groups as follows: AA-alumina air-abrasion; and CC-DCMhotbond coating followed by alumina air-abrasion and hydrofluoric acid etching. For each group, two identically pre-treated zirconia blocks were applied G-Multi Primer, cemented together with G-Cem Linkforce cement and cut into 30 stick-shaped specimens (1 × 1 × 9 mm 3 ). A total of 120 specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h and then assigned to three groups: (i) short-term test, (ii) thermocycling for 5000, and (iii) thermocycling for 10,000 cycles. The specimens were tested in tensile mode. The bond strength results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, followed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 ( α  = 0.05). Failure mode and surfaces were analyzed with optical microscopy and SEM. The EDS, FTIR, XRD, and FIB-SEM were used for chemical, crystalline phase analyses. Results The AA groups recorded higher mean bond strength than the CC groups in all aging conditions. Thermocycling did not affect the bond strength of the AA groups, whereas the bond strength of the CC groups decreased significantly after aging. The MDP monomer and silane in G-Multi Primer chemically reacted with mechanically pre-treated AA and CC surfaces via the absorption of P–O and Si–O groups. Significance The bond strength of a conventional protocol involving alumina air-abrasion was greater than ceramic coating technique.