Multi-energy calibration: an easy strategy for fast and accurate determination of macro- and micronutrients in biomass waste samples by ICP OES

2020 
Multi-energy calibration (MEC) was explored here for fast and accurate multi-element determination of Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, and Zn in biomass waste samples by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). For MEC, only two solution (S1 and S2) per sample were prepared and used for calibration procedure. A 15-mL of solutions S1 and S2 were prepared for the determination of Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn in order to contain 50% (v/v) of sample + 50% (v/v) analytes standard solution, and 50% (v/v) of sample + 50% (v/v) of blank [1.0% (v/v) HNO3], respectively. For Ca, K, and Mg a diluted solutions were prepared by diluting 1.0 mL of S2 with 1.0% (v/v) HNO3 up to 50 mL. The calibration strategy was carried out by measuring S1 and S2 separately and the signal emission intensity of each analyte at different wavelengths by ICP OES is monitored. The obtained values are plotted to graphs that illustrates I(λi)S1 (x-axis) vs I(λi)S2 (y-axis), and the slopes of the resulting curves provides the analytes concentrations. The accuracy of MEC was evaluated using SRM 1515 Apple Leaves and the results were in agreement at 95% confidence level (t-test) with certified values and relative standard deviation < 4.7%. Recovery tests using cassava peels were carried out and the results obtained were in the ranges of 94-100%. The LOD were 0.6, 0.1, 0.07, 1.5, 0.6, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.03 µg g-1 for Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, and Zn, respectively. The calibration strategy was applied in cassava, green bean and banana peels, and the results were in the ranges of 1117±22 – 4517±32 (Ca), 4.00±0.10 – 176.0±2.0 (Cu), 29.5±0.6 – 167.0±2.0 (Fe), 11250±108 – 33903±780 (K), 1186±21 – 4019±77 (Mg), 43.0±1.5 – 83.2±2.2 (Mn), 2.4±0.07 – 63.8±0.6 (Ni), and 9.0±0.4 – 241±2.0 µg g-1 (Zn). The proposed method applied here was compared to external standard calibration (ES) and the results were in agreement at 95% confidence level (t-test).
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    32
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []