Importance of context in protein folding: secondary structural propensities versus tertiary contact-assisted secondary structure formation.

Molecular dynamics simulations can be used to reveal the detailed conformational behaviors of peptides and proteins. By comparing fragment and full-length protein simulations, we can investigate the role of each peptide segment in the folding process. Here, we take advantage of information regarding the helix formation process from our previous simulations of barnase and protein A as well as new simulations of four helical fragments from these proteins at three different temperatures, starting with both helical and extended structures. Segments with high helical propensity began the folding process by tethering the chain through side chain interactions involving either polar interactions, such as salt bridges, or hydrophobic staples. These tethers were frequently nonnative (i.e., not → i + 4 spacing) and provided a scaffold for other residues, thereby limiting the conformational search. The helical structure then propagated on both sides of the tether. Segments with low stability and propensity formed later in the folding process and utilized contacts with other portions of the protein when folding. These helices formed via a tertiary contact-assisted mechanism, primarily via hydrophobic contacts between residues distant in sequence. Thus, segments with different helical propensities appear to play different roles during protein folding. Furthermore, the active role of nonlocal side chains in helix formation highlights why we must move beyond simple hierarchical models of protein folding.