Compromises in Data Selection in a Meta-Analysis of Biodiversity in Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Response to Halme et al.

Yoan Paillet,Laurent Bergès,Joakim Hjältén,Péter Ódor,Catherine Avon,Markus Bernhardt-Römermann,R.J. Bijlsma,Luc De Bruyn,Marc Fuhr,Ulf Grandin,Robert Kanka,Lars Lundin,Sandra Luque,Tibor Magura,Silvia Matesanz,Ilona Mészáros,M. Teresa Sebastià,Wolfgang Schmidt,Tibor Standovár,Béla Tóthmérész,Anneli Uotila,Fernando Valladares,Kai Vellak,Risto Virtanen

Compromises in Data Selection in a Meta-Analysis of Biodiversity in Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Response to Halme et al.

2010

Meta-analysis(MA)isapowerfultoolforrevealinggeneraltrends and quantitatively synthesizing the results of inde-pendent studies. Nevertheless, the procedure has beencriticized, particularly when it has been applied to eco-logical and conservation biology studies.To provide an updated picture of the effect of forestmanagement on biodiversity, we performed an MA with

Keywords:

Environmental resource management
Biodiversity
Meta-analysis
Ecology
Forest management
Forest ecology
Conservation biology
Biology
Pseudoreplication
data selection
meta analisis

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations