Comparison of a Phospholipid-based Protein-free Surfactant and a Natural Bovine Surfactant (SURVANTA) During Pressure and Volume-controlled Ventilation in an Improved Rabbit Fetus Model

Abstract Summary: During pressure- or volume-controlled ventilation different surfactant preparations were compared in an improved rabbit fetus model. Based on a self-designed software program, this model enables on-line registration of lung mechanics and heart rate in up to ten fetuses. Using a commercially available bovine lung surfactant (SURVANTA) as standard, we compared animals treated with a protein-free surfactant preparation containing only phospholipids, PL (dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine:palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylglycerol, DPPC:POPG 70:30) plus palmitic acid (PA) with an untreated ventilated control group. During pressure-controlled ventilation the insufflation pressure (IP) was decreased and increased stepwise with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). SURVANTA was significantly more potent than PL plus PA and both differed significantly from the untreated controls. With additional PEEP the differences between SURVANTA and PL + PA disappeared but the differences to the controls were still present. We found that, with additional PEEP, active natural surfactants lead to ECG-irregularities, which indicates that PEEP influences pulmonary and cardiovascular function and compromises the benefits of surfactant therapy. Also during volume-controlled ventilation SURVANTA was superior to PL + PA and the untreated controls. In order to raise the level of activity of pure PL mixtures to that of natural bovine surfactants, we suggest that a surface active protein (probably SP-C) must be added to such mixtures.