COMPARISONS OF CLINICAL RESULTS AFTER CRUCIATE-RETAINING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – THE CERAMIC KNEE VERSUS CO-CR ALLOY KNEE

The aim of the study was to compare clinical results after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between the ceramic and the Co-Cr alloy condylar prostheses. In a prospective semi-randomised study, 218 patients underwent cruciate-retaining TKA with the Co-Cr alloy prosthesis (Kinemax®, Howmedica) or the LFA-I® prosthesis (Kyocera) composed of an alumina ceramic femoral component and a titaniumalloy tibial component with a UHMWPE insert. In each surgery, both components were fixed with PMMA cement. All the patients underwent the same postoperative management. Finally, 110 knees with the ceramic prosthesis and 84 knees with the Co-Cr prosthesis were followed up for 24 to 124 months (the average of 56 months). Two revisions were performed in each group (tibial tray breakage and infection in the ceramic group, and loosening and infection in the Co-Cr group). In the remaining patients, there were no significant differences in the HSS knee score (85 and 86 points, respectively) and the ROM (112 and 113 degrees) between the two groups. In radiological evaluation, a radiolucent line was more frequently observed with the significance (p In the mid-term follow-up evaluations, the clinical results of the ceramic TKA are equivalent to those of the Co-Cr alloy TKA. In addition, the ceramic prosthesis showed some statistical tendency of superiority to the Co-Cr prosthesis concerning the radiolucent line. These results encouraged us to conduct a long-term follow-up study on the ceramic total knee prosthesis.