Understanding the Assumptions of Major Models of Disability Theory

Fundamental assumptions of body-object of disability theories are laid out. Each is shown to be based on underlying morality as well as epistemology (knowledge). It is shown how, over history, the conception of disability as changed encompassing inter alia: models of possession, bloodletting, charity and welfare among others. By looking at the relation between the Government, economy and person with disability, it is possible to see how varying views gained recognition. Aspects and assumptions of the ‘medical model’ and the biopsychosocial models are explored to show how they continue a history of objectifying people with disability with a focus on the pathological. It is shown how information from this model filters into Websites available to people with ABI. The limitations of the social model and argument couched largely in terms of accessibility are considered. It is concluded that theory often imposes a view on people with disability and that, once a view gains authority, it becomes a focus of professional action. Yet, all such actions are based on assumptions that are open to question.