RESOLUSI KONFLIK MYANMAR-ROHINGYA:SEBUAH PENDEKATAN TRANSCEND

This research is entitled “Myanmar-Rohingya Conflict Resolution: A Transcendent Approach”. The Myanmar and Rohingya conflict is a conflict that has been going on for decades and has not been resolved, even though it has been attempted, but has not shown a successful direction for harmony, because the problems are so complex that they cannot be resolved in ways that have been attempted before. The purpose of this research is to encourage related policies regarding the existence of a peace process and human rights there, so that the case is resolved by peace and humanitarian practitioners. This research is based on the theory of peace according to Johan Galtung. Research on conflict resolution will explore and connect theory with facts, towards transforming conflict in a peaceful way through the approach, transcendent namely: Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy. The research method applied is qualitative explanative, data collection techniques through library research (studi kepustakaan) and observation steps by means of causally assessing either using document-based methods or internet-based methods. The analysis in this research is analysis through secondary data. To prove the validity of the data, this study used triangulation of data sources. The analysis technique used in this research is correlation method with the technique of discourse analysis (analisis wacana). The results of this study indicate that the Rohingya case in Myanmar can be pursued by practitioners of peace and humanity through three interrelated stages of conflict resolution in a transcendent approach with its indicators: namely, conflict transformation analysis is needed for conflict diagnosis and prognosis, but for therapy it requires a prescription. First, the three phases in the Diagnosis stage are explained. Phase I: Prior to the Violence, this was oriented towards long-term and sustainable peace initiatives through soft peacekeeping, combining power with mediation. Phase II: During the Violence, explains what interventions have taken place in Myanmar and whether these UN and ASEAN interventions reduce conflict. Phase III: After Violence, outlines the reactions of interventions in Phase II During Violence as an introduction to the 3R Approach namely Reconstruction, Reconciliation and Resolution for conflict therapy purposes. Second, the Prognosis stage (conflict triangle ABC), explaining each consequence of the inner narrative (cultural context), is being transformed through the non-violent processes experienced in ethnic conflict in general. Third, the results of therapeutic analysis, which are useful for explaining various instruments related to increasing “mediation capacity and strength”, in order to achieve conflict transformation in a peaceful manner. The result, by creating a new reality that can accommodate both of them to foster new relationships, such as ASEAN, where both or the actors involved can live and develop together to find solutions to the Rohingya ethnic conflict problem. This change, in the future, will encourage other actors such as the ASEAN community to play a major role in helping academics and peace practitioners, as well as Galtung explaining the roadmap (peta jalan) best for peace workers who are beginning to be frustrated with reality.