Tolerance, sensitization and dependence to diazepam in Balb/c mice exposed to a novel open space anxiety test.

Balb/c mice were exposed to an elevated platform that is extended on two opposite sides with lowered steep slopes. They were tested for 12 min per session in 6 successive days. They received i.p. administration of either saline or one dose of diazepam (DZP 0.5, 1, 3 mg/kg) in sessions 1–3, and saline in sessions 4 and 5. All groups of mice received a single dose of DZP (1 mg/kg) in session 6. DZP produced inverted U-shaped dose–responses on the number of entries into different areas of the apparatus, with a peak in mean response at 1 mg/kg whereas its effect on the duration of entries was mostly comparable between the 3 doses. It increased the number of crossings on the surface of the platform and facilitated entries onto the slopes. DZP-treated mice crossed frequently onto and spent longer time on the slopes in sessions 1–3 whereas saline-treated mice remained on the platform in sessions 1–6. Withdrawal of DZP in sessions 4–5 increased the latency of first entry and decreased the number and duration of entries onto the slopes which was reversed with the administration of 1 mg/kg of DZP in the next session. This ON–OFF the drug may be due to the half-life of DZP which is very short in mice and rats (∼0.88 h). It also indicates that DZP-treated mice did not benefit from previous experience of entries onto the slopes which suggests a possible “state-dependent” effect. Administration of DZP after repeated exposures to the test did not facilitate entries onto the slopes but instead increased significantly the number of crossings on the surface of the platform; this increase was much higher than that observed in mice initially treated with DZP and exposed to the test. There is no evidence of habituation in saline-treated mice: the number of crossings on the platform was comparable between the first 5 sessions of the test. These results demonstrate that repeated exposures to the same anxiogenic environment resulted in avoidance responses developing tolerance and approach responses developing sensitization. They suggest that tolerance and sensitization are two opposite sides of the habituation process to the same stimulus and may account for the maintained state of anxiety.