Systematic Versus Rapid Versus Scoping Reviews.
2022
The following chapter highlights the methodological similarities/differences and strengths/weaknesses between systematic reviews and two common alternative approaches for knowledge synthesis: rapid reviews and scoping reviews. In doing so, the intention is to provide readers with guidance in determining whether a rapid or scoping review may be more appropriate for addressing the research question(s) and objective(s) of the review team and knowledge users versus a traditional systematic review. To supplement this discussion, this chapter presents widely adopted tools and resources to facilitate the conduct and reporting of both rapid and scoping reviews.
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
27
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI