Gas‐foamed poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) and poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) with bioactive glass fibres demonstrate insufficient bone repair in lapine osteochondral defects

: Deep osteochondral defects may leave voids in the subchondral bone, increasing the risk of joint structure collapse. To ensure a stable foundation for the cartilage repair, bone grafts can be used for filling these defects. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) is a biodegradable material that improves bone healing and supports bone matrix deposition. We compared the reparative capacity of two investigative macroporous PLGA-based biomaterials with two commercially available bone graft substitutes in the bony part of an intra-articular bone defect created in the lapine femur. New Zealand white rabbits (n = 40) were randomized into five groups. The defects, 4 mm in diameter and 8 mm deep, were filled with neat PLGA; a composite material combining PLGA and bioactive glass fibres (PLGA-BGf); commercial beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) granules; or commercial bioactive glass (BG) granules. The fifth group was left untreated for spontaneous repair. After three months, the repair tissue was evaluated with X-ray microtomography and histology. Relative values comparing the operated knee with its contralateral control were calculated. The relative bone volume fraction (∆BV/TV) was largest in the β-TCP group (p ≤ 0.012), which also showed the most abundant osteoid. BG resulted in improved bone formation, whereas defects in the PLGA-BGf group were filled with fibrous tissue. Repair with PLGA did not differ from spontaneous repair. The PLGA, PLGA-BGf, and spontaneous groups showed thicker and sparser trabeculae than the commercial controls. We conclude that bone repair with β-TCP and BG granules was satisfactory, whereas the investigational PLGA-based materials were only as good as or worse than spontaneous repair.