Analysis of the variation in the action of L‐365,260 at CCKB/gastrin receptors in rat, guinea‐pig and mouse isolated gastric tissue assays

Abstract 1. Since L-365,260 was first described as a selective antagonist at cholecystokinin (CCK)B/gastrin receptors, we have used it periodically as a reference compound in isolated tissue assays of guinea-pig gastric muscle and lumen-perfused stomachs from mouse and immature rat. L-365,260 behaved as a surmountable antagonist and produced parallel rightward shifts of pentagastrin concentration-effect curves' in each of the replicate experiments. The experiments were performed by several different experimenters in the same laboratories over a five year period. 2. In the isolated, lumen-perfused, immature rat stomach assay, L-365,260 behaved as a simple competitive antagonist (Schild plot slope = 1.00 +/- 0.10, pKB = 7.54 +/- 0.03 from a global analysis of the data) acting at a homogeneous population of receptors in five separate, highly-reproducible, experiments. In contrast, the replicate data sets obtained from the interaction in the isolated, lumen-perfused mouse stomach and guinea-pig gastric muscle assays, over the same period, were not consistent with the presence of a single receptor population. The guinea-pig gastric muscle data were relatively reproducible between experiments but some individual Schild plot slopes and the slope estimated from a global analysis of all the data were significantly less than unity (slope = 0.80 +/- 0.07, pA2 = 8.56 +/- 0.05 from the global analysis). The data obtained in the mouse stomach were significantly more variable than that obtained in the same assay, during the same period, from the interaction between histamine and the H2-receptor antagonist, famotidine. The individual Schild plot slopes ranged from being very flat (0.20) to being not significantly different from unity (1.23) and the pA2 values ranged from 7.68 to 8.70. 3. Overall, the data could be accounted for by assuming the variable expression of two receptor subtypes across the assays. The rat stomach appeared to express a single receptor characterized by a low affinity constant for L-365,260 (pKB approximately 7.5). The guinea-pig gastric muscle and mouse stomach data could be explained by the presence of this receptor and a second one characterized by a high affinity constant for L-365,260 (pKB approximately 8.6). The activity of the two proposed receptor subtypes was consistent between experiments in the guinea-pig and the high affinity receptor appeared to be predominant. In contrast, the mouse stomach data could only be simulated by assuming that the proportion and absolute number of each subtype varied significantly between the replicate experiments. 4. The L-365,260 affinity estimates at the inferred receptor subtypes were indistinguishable from those obtained in a corresponding analysis of the behaviour of L-365,260 in CCKB/gastrin receptor radioligand binding experiments in guinea-pig gastric gland and mouse and rat cerebral cortex preparations.