Virtual fencing of cattle using an automated collar in a feed attractant trial

Abstract Managing grazing cattle can be challenging in environmentally-sensitive areas or when there is limited contact with and control over the animals. Virtual fences – barriers without a physical barrier – represent the potential for animal guidance in locations where physical fences may be unfeasible. In this study automated collars that provided audio and electrical stimuli to cattle were tested on 12 naive heifers to determine if cattle could be deterred from a feed attractant in a series of 3 test paddocks. All animals were individually trained (no virtual fence line set) across 3 days (each paddock once per day) to walk unrestricted down to a bale of hay. The heifers were then each fitted with the experimental prototype collar device and a virtual fence line was set across the width of each paddock to restrict animals from the hay reward. As the animal approached the virtual fence line the collar emitted a 2.5 s audio cue (785 Hz ± 15 Hz, 58DB). If the animal stopped or turned away no further cues were emitted, if the animal continued forward an electrical stimulus (800 V electrical pulses delivered in less than 1 s) was applied immediately following the audio cue. The audio-electrical stimulus sequence was repeated as animals continued into the exclusion zone (where the hay was located). Each animal was tested in each paddock across 3 days reaching a total of 8 trials when animals were no longer voluntarily approaching the hay. Logistic regression analyses showed a mean number of 6 interactions with the fence line until 50% of animals were learning to avoid the fence line based on the audio cue. The odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.14–1.44) showed that with each fence interaction, animals were 28% more likely to appropriately respond to the audio cue and avoid the electrical stimulus (Likelihood Ratio Test χ 2  = 21.51, DF = 1, P