Concurrent and carryover effects of feeding blends of protein and amino acids in high-protein diets with different concentrations of forage fiber to fresh cows. 1. Production and blood metabolites.

ABSTRACT Because of low feed intake during the first weeks of lactation, dietary concentration of metabolizable protein (MP) must be elevated. We evaluated effects of providing additional rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) from a single source or a blend of protein and AA sources during the first 3 wk of lactation. We also evaluated whether replacing forage fiber (fNDF) or nonforage fiber with the blend affected responses. In a randomized block design, at approximately 2 wk prepartum, 40 primigravid (664 ± 44 kg of body weight) and 40 multigravid (797 ± 81 kg of body weight) Holsteins were blocked by calving date and fed a common diet (11.5% crude protein, CP). After calving to 25 d in milk (DIM), cows were fed 1 of 4 diets formulated to be (1) 20% deficient in metabolizable protein (MP) based on predicted milk production (17% CP, 24% fNDF), (2) adequate in MP using primarily RUP from soy to increase MP concentration (AMP; 20% CP, 24% fNDF), (3) adequate in MP using a blend of RUP and rumen-protected AA sources to increase MP concentration (Blend; 20% CP, 24% fNDF), or (4) similar to Blend but substituting fNDF with added RUP rather than nonforage neutral detergent fiber (Blend-fNDF; 20% CP, 19% fNDF). The blend was formulated to have a RUP supply with an AA profile similar to that of casein. A common diet (17% CP) was fed from 26 to 92 DIM, and milk production and composition were measured from 26 to 92 DIM, but individual dry matter intake (DMI) was measured only until 50 DIM. During the treatment period for both parities, AMP and Blend increased energy-corrected milk (ECM) yields compared with the diet deficient in MP based on predicted milk production (40.7 vs. 37.8 kg/d) and reduced concentrations of plasma 3-methyl-His (4.1 vs. 5.3 µmol/L) and growth hormone (9.0 vs. 11.9 ng/mL). Blend had greater DMI than AMP (17.4 vs. 16.1 kg/d), but ECM yields were similar. Blend had greater plasma Met (42.0 vs. 26.4 µmol/L) and altered metabolites associated with antioxidant production and methyl donation compared with AMP. Conversely, the concentration of total essential AA in plasma was less in Blend versus AMP (837 vs. 935 µmol/L). In multiparous cows, Blend-fNDF decreased DMI and ECM yield compared with Blend (19.2 vs. 20.1 kg/d of DMI, 45.3 vs. 51.1 kg/d of ECM), whereas primiparous cows showed the opposite response (15.3 vs. 14.6 kg/d of DMI, 32.9 vs. 31.4 kg/d of ECM). Greater DMI for multiparous cows fed Blend carried over from 26 to 50 DIM and was greater compared with AMP (23.1 vs. 21.2 kg /d) and Blend-fNDF (21.3 kg/d). Blend also increased ECM yield compared with AMP (49.2 vs. 43.5 kg/d) and Blend-fNDF (45.4 kg/d) from 26 to 92 DIM. Few carryover effects of fresh cow treatments on production were found in primiparous cows. Overall, feeding blends of RUP and AA may improve the balance of AA for fresh cows fed high MP diets and improve concurrent and longer-term milk production in multiparous cows. However, with high MP diets, multiparous fresh cows require greater concentrations of fNDF than primiparous cows.