Reply to Hughes et al.: No bullying: Publications comply with international standards

Hughes et al. (1) claim we made unauthorized use of their unpublished data in our publications on the bovine Y chromosome (BTAY) 2–5). These accusations are troubling in their intent and unfounded. First, we carefully followed the international standards, including the Fort Lauderdale (www.genome.gov/pages/research/wellcomereport0303.pdf) and Toronto Agreements (www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7261/full/461168a.html) for public sharing of biological datasets. In all cases, proper acknowledgments were made in our publications whenever publically available data were used. Second, we have studied BTAY for >15 years with financial support from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). In 2007, we initiated a direct testis cDNA selection approach to study the transcriptome of BTAY using a Y-specific DNA library (6). We identified a number of unique transcripts (cDNAs), including those transcribed from PRAMEY, ZNF280AY, and ZNF280BY (3, 4). By BLAST searching with our cDNA sequences, we identified a large number of bovine bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) that were listed as unassigned in 2008. We informed Dr. Kim Worley and Dr. David Page about our discovery, requesting a potential collaboration, which was not welcomed, so we continued our work independently. We analyzed the PRAMEY-, ZNF280AY-, and ZNF280BY-linked BACs (51 of 58 were unassigned) and acknowledged the sequence data producer in our publications (3, 4). Third, the draft BTAY sequence assembly (GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CM001061","term_id":"355348779"}}CM001061) was used as a reference during our analysis of the BTAY transcriptome (5). We aligned the testis RNA-seq reads against the draft BTAY assembly to identify Y-linked reads for assembly of RNAs, which were used for the Y locus–specific expression study. Because the draft BTAY assembly was reported to GenBank in 2010, the use of the draft assembly as a reference in our work (5) is entirely consistent with the Toronto Agreement, which states the protected time period to allow the data producers to publish the analysis of their dataset is “ideally within one year.” Fourth, we recently deposited the testis RNA-seq data generated for the BTAY transcriptome analysis into GenBank. The delay in release of these data was due to the death of our dear friend and coauthor, Dr. Ernest Retzel. Finally, we welcome any researchers to challenge our research findings regarding the number of protein coding genes on BTAY with data. Our predicted number of genes was based on de novo assembly of the Y-linked RNA-seq reads, and the alignment of the assembled cDNAs against the draft BTAY assembly to the predicted gene loci based on the splicing sites and ORF lengths (≥90 amino acids) (5). Therefore, the claims of Hughes et al. are unjustified, set a bad precedent for the entire research community, and are inconsistent with the goals of large, publically funded projects, for which rapid public disclosure of sequence results is required. We agree with Hughes et al. that the release is required “so the data could be used by the community.” Only with this approach will public research funds be used for maximum societal benefit.