Performance of selected indicators in evaluating the consequences of dredged material relocation and marine aggregate extraction

Abstract Eleven indicators were applied to macrofaunal species abundance data obtained from four dredged material relocation sites and four aggregate extraction sites in UK waters. Indicators were subsequently scored on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) according to their performance in relation to six criteria governing their utility. Number of species ( S ) and number of individuals ( N ) generally scored highest in terms of understandability, sensitivity and linkage to the human activity whilst biotic indices were assigned relatively low scores, particularly in relation to aggregate extraction activities, according to the same criteria. As the immediate consequences of dredged material relocation and aggregate extraction activities are largely physical in nature the relative insensitivity of these indices may be explained by their dependence on species responses principally to organic enrichment. Indicators that incorporated measures of relatedness of species (i.e. average taxonomic distinctness, taxonomic breadth and average phylogenetic diversity) were assigned relatively low scores due to inconsistency in identifying spatial trends, and relative insensitivity. However, such indices may have the potential advantage of illuminating the causes as well as simply the existence of change and merit further examination. The adopted approach to quantifying indicator utility is critically examined and recommendations are made for future refinements.