Re-Evaluating Evidence for Best Practice in Paediatric Speech-Language Pathology

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of treatment trials for children with speech and language difficulties often exemplify the limited clinical usefulness of the evidence base, reflecting recent literature in evidence-based medicine. Other studies report that clinicians often fail to seek information about best practice, across the health professions. Consequently, clinical researchers, including those in speech-language pathology, have sought alternative methodologies for determining best practice. SUMMARY: Some approaches focus on "pragmatic trials," usually as part of existing health services. Others place case management of individuals at the centre of intervention presenting studies of one or more cases, including N-of-1 randomized controlled trials and cross-over group designs. Clinical case studies can provide important theoretical data contributing to our understanding of the development of typical and atypical communication. Precision medicine (also known as personalized medicine) is an emerging approach to building the clinical evidence base that acknowledges the importance of individual genetic and environmental differences between people. With increasing knowledge of aetiological heterogeneity, even within children presenting with the same diagnosis (e.g., childhood apraxia of speech), data reinforce the edict that children are not all born equal. Key Message: This review argues that to understand response to treatment, it is critical to examine child-related factors as well as the variables of the intervention itself.