Female comparative mate choice reflects strategic male nesting strategy in the peacock blenny Salaria pavo

Abstract Emerging evidence endorses the idea that comparative instead of rational choice is widespread among species and mating contexts. In a comparative scenario the attractiveness of a male is not absolute but depends on the attractiveness of the other males to whom he is compared by females. Therefore, a male may benefit from the ability to choose the appropriate context that enhances his attractiveness. Here we test for the occurrence of strategic male nesting strategies in the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo, a fish species in which females evaluate potential mates by comparing males. Our results show that the large majority of males choose the context that maximize their attractiveness by nesting close to less attractive neighbours. Overall, we suggest that, in the peacock blenny, comparative, non-directional female choice is associated to strategic male nesting strategies and this scenario may contribute to the maintenance of genetic variability of male sexually-selected traits.