Modernising composite materials regulations: A position paper

One of the major inhibitors to the uptake of composites in new sectors is that regulations, codes and standards are often inappropriate for composites. This is because they are both explicitly and implicitly based on named materials, such as steel, and do not permit consideration of composites applications despite the strengths and benefits of the materials in many cases. This review provides important evidence supporting the primary aim of the RCS Working Group, as expressed in the 2016 CLF Composites Strategy, to work with regulators and standards bodies to adapt regulations to enable (greater) use of composites. Through this collaboration, the University of Southampton study helps CLF achieve the benefits that will arise from greater use of composites through, for example, increased durability and design flexibility, and lightweighting. A lack of appropriate codes and standards is recognised as a key barrier to the uptake of composite materials across many sectors. Composites UK fully supports a performancebased approach to standards where proof of a material’s fit for purpose is tested. This report highlights where this approach is utilised and has enabled the use of new and innovative materials, as well as traditional ones, to the benefit and progression of the sector. Applying this approach across other sectors can only bring benefit to those industries and UK PLC.