A mental number line in human newborns

In the 19th century Francis Galton first reported that humans represent numbers on a mental number line with smaller numbers on the left and larger numbers on the right. It has been suggested that this orientation emerges as a result of reading/writing habits for both words or numbers. Recent evidence in animals and infants in the first months of life has challenged the primary role of language in determining the left-to-right direction of spatial-numerical association, SNA. However, the possibility that SNA is learnt by early exposure to directional biases of caregivers is still open. Here we show that 55-hour-old newborns, once habituated to a number (i.e., 12), spontaneously associated a smaller number (i.e., 4) with the left side and a larger number (i.e., 36) with the right side of space. Moreover, SNA in neonates was not absolute but relative. The same number (i.e., 12) was associated with the left side whenever the previously experienced number was larger (i.e., 36), but with the right side whenever the number was smaller (i.e., 4). Control on continuous physical variables showed that the effect was specific of discrete magnitudes. Hence, soon after birth humans associate smaller numbers with the left space and larger numbers with the right space. These results constitute strong evidence that in our species SNA originates from pre-linguistic and biologically precursors in the brain.