The Transformation Problem: Samuelson and Marx Reach the Same Goal by Different Routes

The transformation problem has been a big barrier for us for more than 100 years and seemed to be solved with no way. However when I gave the general model of transition which is the first one to satisfy two propositions of being totally consistent and thus made a great step forward in 2000 I found that there were actually many methods to solve the problem with mathematics and at least two kinds meaningfully in economics. i.e. the static model and the dynamic model. Recently when I was studying interrogation on the model of transition by Samuelson in 1957 I fatherly found that in Samuelson s methods there contained the second way to solve the transformation problem: price of production of Marx is transformed from value whereas that of Samuelson is born by the system of physical objects. That is with Samuelson value and price of production have the same roots and closely connected where the roots are the same system of physical objects and the two flowers born are respectively the value and the price of production. So studies by Samuelson disclose that the two systems of value and the price of production could be formed from the same system of physical objects which could also satisfy the two propositions of being totally consistent .T his is just the best argument for Marx s theory of price of production! From this point of view we could say that Samuelson and Marx actually reach the same goal by different routes.