Evaluation of seismic vulnerability screening indices using data from the Taiwan Earthquake of 6 February 2016

Cities in seismic regions often have unknown numbers of older buildings vulnerable to strong earthquake ground motion. Simple methods are needed with urgency to screen these buildings. The problem is of immense proportions as it affects some of the largest cities in the world. Seismic vulnerability indices proposed by Hassan and Sozen (ACI Struct J 94(1):31–39, 1997), Islam et al. (Architectural Institute of Japan-Academic Lecture Collection Summary, 2017), NCREE (Chiou et al. in 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE 2017, Santiago, 2017), and Shiga et al. (Proceedings, Tohuku District symposium, Architectural Institute of Japan, 1968) possess the required simplicity. The indices have different forms and have been calibrated through independent activities, but all imply that the key to building survival is in the relative sizes of elements resisting lateral inertial forces. Data collected after the 2016 Meinong, Taiwan, Earthquake were used to evaluate these indices. The evaluation showed that differences among indices did not lead to wide differences in the cost associated with a given benefit especially if they are used to include the effects of all lateral-load resisting elements including masonry infill.