Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation and Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C in Glaucoma Secondary to Aniridia: AADI Versus Trabeculectomy in Aniridia.

PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolab) placement and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with glaucoma secondary to aniridia. DESIGN Retrospective comparative interventional case series. METHODS This study included patients with congenital aniridia who underwent AADI implantation or trabeculectomy with MMC. Surgical failure was defined as IOP > 21 mm Hg or reduced <20% from baseline, IOP ≤ 5 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision. RESULTS A total of 30 eyes of 30 patients underwent surgical treatment, including 18 eyes that received an AADI and 12 eyes that had a trabeculectomy with MMC. The cumulative probability of failure at 2 years was 11.1% (95% CI = 2.9%-37.6%) in the AADI group and 58.3% (95% CI = 33.5%-84.8%) in the trabeculectomy group (P = .05, log-rank). At 2 years, IOP (mean ± SD) was 14.1 ± 2.8 mm Hg in the AADI group and 19.6 ± 6.6 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group (P = .02), and the number of glaucoma medications was 1.7 ± 0.9 in the AADI group and 2.2 ± 0.8 in the trabeculectomy group (P = .25). Surgical complications developed in 1 patient in each treatment group (P = .65). Cataract surgery was performed in 5 (42%) patients in the trabeculectomy group and no patients in the AADI group (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Placement of an AADI resulted in lower IOP and a higher rate of surgical success compared to trabeculectomy with MMC in eyes with glaucoma associated with aniridia. Cataract extraction was more frequently required after trabeculectomy with MMC than AADI implantation.