Simultaneously acquired PET and ASL imaging biomarkers may be helpful in differentiating progression from pseudo-progression in treated gliomas.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was investigating the methods based on coupling cerebral perfusion (ASL) and amino acid metabolism ([18F]DOPA-PET) measurements to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI in glioma follow-up. METHODS Images were acquired using a 3-T PET/MR system, on a prospective cohort of patients addressed for possible glioma progression. Data were preprocessed with statistical parametric mapping (SPM), including registration on T1-weighted images, spatial and intensity normalization, and tumor segmentation. As index tests, tumor isocontour maps of [18F]DOPA-PET and ASL T-maps were created and metabolic/perfusion abnormalities were evaluated with the asymmetry index z-score. SPM map analysis of significant size clusters and semi-quantitative PET and ASL map evaluation were performed and compared to the gold standard diagnosis. Lastly, ASL and PET topography of significant clusters was compared to that of the initial tumor. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients with unilateral treated glioma were included (34 progressions and 24 pseudo-progressions). The tumor isocontour maps and T-maps showed the highest specificity (100%) and sensitivity (94.1%) for ASL and [18F]DOPA analysis, respectively. The sensitivity of qualitative SPM maps and semi-quantitative rCBF and rSUV analyses were the highest for glioblastoma. CONCLUSION Tumor isocontour T-maps and combined analysis of CBF and [18F]DOPA-PET uptake allow achieving high diagnostic performance in differentiating between progression and pseudo-progression in treated gliomas. The sensitivity is particularly high for glioblastomas. KEY POINTS • Applied separately, MRI and PET imaging modalities may be insufficient to characterize the brain glioma post-therapeutic profile. • Combined ASL and [18F]DOPA-PET map analysis allows differentiating between tumor progression and pseudo-progression.