Diamond-Forrester und Kardio-CT : Muss die KHK-Vortestwahrscheinlichkeit neu definiert werden? (Schwerpunkt)

Apart from the Diamond-Forrester classification, which is widely used particularly in the USA for the pretest probability of coronary artery disease, other scores also exist, such as an updated version of the classification table by Genders et al., the Morise score and the Duke clinical risk score. These scores estimate the probability of coronary artery disease, defined as the presence of at least one high-grade stenosis, based on symptom characteristics, age, gender and other parameters. All of the scores were derived from patient cohorts in which invasive coronary angiography had been performed for clinical reasons. It has subsequently been shown that these scores, especially those developed several decades ago, substantially overestimate the pretest probability of coronary artery disease. When these risk scores are applied to patients for whom a non-invasive work-up of suspected coronary artery disease is planned, for example by coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, the expected prevalence of significant coronary stenosis will be overestimated. This, in turn, influences the test characteristics and the significance of the non-invasive examination (positive and negative predictive values) and needs to be taken into account when interpreting test results.