Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Nicorandil Application in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Low Basic Blood Pressure.

AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous nicorandil application in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) with low baseline blood pressure (systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg). METHOD This prospective, controlled, single-centre study randomised 147 patients with AHF with low baseline blood pressure (including both emergent admission and newly developed low blood pressure while in hospital) to one of the following two groups: (1) control group (conventional diuretics, positive inotropic agents, and related therapy according to the guidelines); and (2) intervention group (intravenous [IV] nicorandil application plus routine care). Dyspnoea severity, the ratio of E to e' (E/e'), the incidence of side effects and adverse events, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; left ventricular systolic function) before discharge, average length of hospitalisation, LVEF and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) at 3 months after discharge, incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and readmission rate within 3 months were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS Compared to the control group, nicorandil relieved dyspnoea effectively and improved E/e' significantly; the level of NT-proBNP was lower, LVEF was higher before discharge, and average length of hospital stay was shorter in the intervention group. After 3 months, the LVEF was higher, sST2 was lower, and the readmission rate was lower in the intervention group; there was no statistically significant difference in MACCE. CONCLUSIONS Patients with AHF with low baseline blood pressure could benefit from IV nicorandil application in the urgent phase, but the long-term profits remained to be confirmed.