Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithms for the High-Resolution Research Tomograph

The high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) is a dedicated human brain PET scanner. At present, iterative reconstruction methods are preferred for reconstructing HRRT studies. However, these iterative reconstruction algorithms show bias in short-duration frames. New algorithms such as the shifted Poisson ordered-subsets expectation maximization (SP-OSEM) and ordered-subsets weighted least squares (OSWLS) showed promising results in bias reduction, compared with the recommended ordinary Poisson OSEM (OP-OSEM). The goal of this study was to evaluate quantitative accuracy of these iterative reconstruction algorithms, compared with 3-dimensional filtered backprojection (3D-FBP). Methods: The 3 above-mentioned 3D iterative reconstruction methods were implemented for the HRRT. To evaluate the various 3D iterative reconstruction techniques quantitatively, several phantom studies and a human brain study(n 55)wereperformed.Results:OSWLSshowedalowand almost linearly increasingcoefficientof variation (SD over average activity concentration), with decreasing noise-equivalent count rates. In decay studies, OSWLS showed good agreement with the 3D-FBPgray matter (GM)‐to‐white matter (WM) contrastratio (,4%), and OP-OSEM and SP-OSEM showed agreement within 6% and 7%, respectively. For various frame durations, both SPOSEM and OP-OSEM showed the fewest errors in GM-to-WM contrast ratios, varying 75% between different noise-equivalent count rates; this variability was much higher for other iterative methods (.92%). 3D-FBP showed the least variability (34%). Visually, OSWLS hardly showed any artifacts in parametric images and showed good agreement with 3D-FBP data for parametric images, especially in the case of reference-tissue kinetic methods (slope, 1.02; Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.99). Conclusion: OP-OSEM, SP-OSEM, and OSWLS showed good performance for phantom studies. In addition, OSWLS showed better results for parametric analysis of clinical studies and is therefore recommended for quantitative HRRT brain PET studies.