Prognostic impacts of serum uric acid levels in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the CHART‐2 study

AIMS Prognostic impacts of serum uric acid (UA) levels in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain inconclusive, especially for the whole range of serum UA levels. METHODS AND RESULTS In the Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District-2 (CHART-2) study, we enrolled 4652 consecutive patients with CHF and classified them into four groups based on baseline serum UA levels by the Classification and Regression Tree: G1 ( 9.2 mg/dL, N = 251). Mean age was 71 ± 12, 69 ± 12, 68 ± 13, and 69 ± 15 years in G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively (P < 0.001). During the median follow-up of 6.3 years, in G1, G2, G3, and G4, 111 (35%), 905 (29%), 370 (36%), and 139 (55%) patients died and 79 (25%), 729 (24%), 300 (29%), and 115 (46%) experienced heart failure hospitalization, respectively (both P < 0.001). G1 was characterized by a significantly high prevalence of women as compared with G2, G3, and G4 (59%, 32%, 24%, and 23%, respectively). Serum creatinine levels (0.8 ± 0.4, 0.9 ± 0.4, 1.2 ± 0.6, and 1.4 ± 0.8 mg/dL, respectively), prevalence of atrial fibrillation (34%, 39%, 45%, and 50%, respectively), and diuretics use (36%, 45%, 67%, and 89%, respectively) increased from G1, G2, G3 to G4 (all P < 0.001), while left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from G1, G2, G3 to G4 (59 ± 15, 58 ± 15, 54 ± 15, and 52 ± 17%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that, as compared with G2, both G1 and G4 had increased incidence of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.67, P = 0.009; aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61, P = 0.037, respectively] and heart failure admission (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.78, P = 0.008 and aHR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.06-1.71, P = 0.014, respectively). This U-shaped relationship was evident in the elderly patients. Furthermore, abnormal transitions to either higher or lower levels of serum UA from G2 were associated with increased mortality (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.57, P = 0.012; aHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12-2.20, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that serum UA levels have the U-shaped prognostic effects and abnormal transitions to either higher or lower levels are associated with poor prognosis in the elderly patients with CHF.