Image quality comparison of a nonlinear image-based noise reduction technique with a hybrid-type iterative reconstruction for pediatric computed tomography.

Abstract Purpose To compare computed tomography (CT) image properties between a vendor-independent image-based noise reduction technique, Image-space Noise Reduction (iNoir) and a hybrid-type iterative reconstruction technique, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR). Methods A cylindrical water phantom, corresponding to pediatric body size, containing soft-tissue-equivalent rod and 12-mg iodine/ml rod was scanned at size-specific dose estimates of 8.4 and 16.7 mGy. For assessments of image quality and noise texture change, task-based system performance function (SPF) and peak frequency difference (PFD) were compared, respectively, among filtered back projection (FBP), IR image with 50%-blending rate (50%ASIR), 100%ASIR, 50%iNoir, and 100%iNoir. Human observer test for pediatric CT images was performed by radiologists. Results For the soft-tissue contrast, SPF2 of 100%iNoir was the highest. The average SPF2 between 0.1 and 0.5 cycles/mm for 100%iNoir increased by approximately 70% compared with FBP, while ASIR indicted slight increases in the frequency region of >0.2 cycles/mm. For the iodine contrast, 100%iNoir indicated highest values at the spatial frequencies corresponding pediatric artery diameters. The PFDs of iNoir were negligible and lower than that of ASIR. The results of human observer test supported results of SPF2 and PFD. Conclusions Compared with ASIR, iNoir provided better image quality for pediatric abdominal CT without compromising noise texture change.