External quality assessment in the absence of proficiency testing: A split-sample testing program experience.

Abstract In the field of laboratory medicine, proficiency testing is a vehicle used to improve the reliability of reported results. When proficiency tests are unavailable for a given analyte, an alternative approach is required to ensure adherence to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189:2012 standard. In this study, we report the results of a split-sample testing program performed as an alternative to a formal PT. This testing method was based on recommendations provided in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) QMS24 guideline. Two different laboratories measured, in duplicate, the heparan sulfate concentration in five samples using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The data analysis to determine the criterion used for the comparability assessment between the two laboratories was based on Appendix E of the QMS24 guideline. Mean interlaboratory differences fell within the maximum allowable differences calculated from the application of the QMS24 guideline, indicating that the results obtained by the two laboratories were comparable across the concentrations tested. Application of the QMS24 split-sample testing procedure allows laboratories to objectively assess test results, thus providing the evidence needed to face an accreditation audit with confidence. However, due to the limitations of statistical analyses in small samples (participants and/or materials), laboratory specialists should assess whether the maximum allowable differences obtained are suitable for the intended use, and make adjustments if necessary.