The optimal tumor response assessment in patients with HCC after treatment of TACE.

215 Background: WHO or RECIST has been considered as suboptimal methods for tumor response assessment in HCC, especially receiving locoregional therapies. Recently, new modified methods having concept of viable tumor has been proposed. Herein we compared the efficacy to assess response and to predict prognosis between WHO, RECIST, EASL, mRECIST in HCC patients receiving TACE. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 141 HCC patients who were newly diagnosed and received TACE between August 2005 and November 2006. Among them, 98 patients who were available for assessing treatment response were analyzed at 1 month after 2nd TACE. We evaluated intermethod aggreement between methods and assessed the efficacy predicting time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Results: The results of tumor responses (number of CR/ PR/ SD/ PD) by WHO/ RECIST/ EASL/ mRECIST were 1/ 14/ 74/ 9, 1/ 12/ 77/ 8, 34/ 34/ 25/ 5, 34/ 28/ 31/ 5, respectively. The κvalue of intermethod agreement for EASL vs WHO, EASL vs RECIST, mRE...