Peripheral and periosteal chondrosarcoma: MRI-pathological correlation in 58 cases.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether MRI can distinguish atypical cartilaginous tumour/grade 1 peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (ACT/Gd1 PP-CS) from high-grade peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (HG-PP-CS) or dedifferentiated peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (DD-PP-CS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of patients diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2020 who had undergone resection of PP-CS. Data collected included age, sex, and skeletal location. Histological tumour grades based on surgical resection were classified as ACT/grade 1 PP-CS, HG-PP-CS, or DD-PP-CS. A variety of MRI features were reviewed independently by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to final diagnosis and compared between the 3 groups. For statistical analysis, HG-PP-CS and DD-PP-CS were combined. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 31 (53%) males and 27 (47%) females with a mean age at diagnosis of 46.1 years (range 11-83 years), 14 (24%) of whom had an underlying diagnosis of diaphyseal aclasis. Forty-one (70.7%) cases were peripheral and 17 (29.3%) periosteal, 38 (66%) involving the flat bones, 15 (26%) the major long bones, 3 (5%) the spine, and 2 (3%) the bones of the hands and feet. Final histology revealed 33 (57%) ACT/Gd1-PP-CS, 18 (31%) HG-PP-CS, and 7 (12%) DD-PP-CS. Periosteal tumours were 16 times more likely to be HG/DD-CS compared to peripheral tumours (p < 0.001). Intra-medullary tumour extension was predictive of HG/DD-CS (p = 0.004) for both tumour types, while cap thickness (p = 0.04) and a diffuse cap type (p = 0.03) were differentiating features of low-grade and high-grade peripheral CS. DISCUSSION A variety of features can help differentiate low-grade from high-grade peripheral/periosteal CS, the most significant being origin from the bone surface.