Orthopaedic Residents’ Interpretation of Point-of-Care Assessment of Distal Radial Fractures with Use of Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is a tool that is being used increasingly. However, the interpretation of ultrasound images of fractures is not incorporated into orthopaedic training programs. This paper presents the results of an initiative to train orthopaedic surgery residents to accurately interpret images of distal radial fractures in adults and to assess their confidence levels and attitudes regarding their future use of ultrasonography. METHODS: Six junior residents were given a pretest with 100 distal radial images that had been made with a pocket-sized ultrasound device; they were asked to determine fracture versus nonfracture cases (50 cases) as well as reduced fracture versus nonreduced fracture cases (50 cases). Following the pretest, residents completed a 30-minute tutorial (didactic and practical) on distal radial ultrasonography. The residents then completed a period of self-practice during 2 separate trauma rotations (a total of 14 to 16 weeks in a single academic year). Following completion of their second trauma rotation, the residents completed a posttest. Comfort level using a pocket-sized ultrasound device also was assessed during pretesting and posttesting. RESULTS: The median number of days from the pretest to the posttest was 212 days (range, 175 to 225 days). Residents demonstrated an overall improvement in positive predictive value (PPV) of identifying a fracture from the pretest (86.0%; range, 77.5% to 93.1%) to the posttest (93.5%; range, 91.4% to 94.2%). The overall negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying a fracture also improved from the pretest (69.4%; range, 60.0% to 76.9%) to the posttest (81.0%; range, 76.4% to 86.7%; p = 0.04). The overall PPV for detecting a reduced fracture improved from 67.1% with the pretest (range, 54.2% to 82.4%) to 88.9% with the posttest (range, 83.3% to 94.1%; p = 0.04). The comfort level with using the ultrasound device also increased between pretesting and posttesting, and the residents felt that ultrasonography would be useful in the care of distal radial fractures. CONCLUSIONS: After a focused training session and a period of self-practice, orthopaedic residents improved their interpretation of ultrasound images and their comfort level using pocket-sized ultrasound devices with adult patients with distal radial fractures. Residents felt that a pocket-sized ultrasound device was useful for fracture diagnosis and evaluation of reduction.