Conventional aortic valve replacement in 2005 elderly patients: a 32-year experience

OBJECTIVES: Considering the good immediate results reported for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients, the role of conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) is being questioned, especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate our long-term results of conventional AVR in octogenarians. METHODS: A total of 2005 patients aged ≥80 years underwent AVR for aortic stenosis in our institution between 1978 and 2011. Of these, 1009 (50%) patients had an associated extracardiac comorbidity and 650 (32%) patients had coronary lesions. Valve replacement was the sole procedure in 1515 (76%) patients, and 396 (19%) patients had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Data were collected at the time of surgery in our database, and regularly updated by mailed questionnaires and telephone contact. RESULTS: Early mortality of isolated AVR was 5.5% for the last 10 years of the series. Significant risk factors were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, advanced cardiac disease [left or right ventricular failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV and atrial fibrillation] and coronary disease. Long-term follow-up was 99.5% complete (9 patients lost to follow-up), totalling 8849 patient-years. Nine hundred and one patients died at late follow-up with a median survival of 7.1 years, with 7 patients becoming centenarian. Apart from older age, main late causes of death were cardiovascular (20.5%), neurological deficit (10.2%) and cancer (10.2%). Actuarial survival was 83%, 62.5% and 25% at 2, 5 and 10 years, respectively. This survival compares favourably with that of a French-matched population. Above all, 90% of late survivors reported functional improvement. Univariable and multivariable analysis identified risk factors of late death as male gender, associated comorbidity, renal failure, advanced cardiac disease, atrial fibrillation and impaired ventricular function. Coronary lesions, associated cardiac surgery and small diameter prostheses (19 or 21 mm) did not impair long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: AVR is effective for all age groups to treat aortic stenosis. Elderly people should not be denied surgery only because of their old age as conventional AVR provides an excellent quality of life and restores life expectancy. Percutaneous valve implantation is to be considered, in cases of non-operable or high-risk patients. However, to date, open-heart surgery remains the treatment of choice for aortic stenosis for the majority of patients.