Differences in long-term outcome after femoral, subclavian andaortic approach to transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI)
2014
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
represents an effective treatment of high-risk patients with
severe aortic stenosis. There is no evidence of the long-term
outcome of alternative approaches to TAVI. Aim: To asses the
clinical outcome after subclavian and aortic TAVI compared to
standard femoral approach. Methods: Prospective single-centre
study comprise 228 consecutive TAVI patients (average age 79
years, logistic EuroSCORE 17.2, 53.5% females) divided in
1)Femoral, 2)Aortic and 3)Subclavian groups. More peripheral
artery disease was found in both Aortic and Subclavian groups.
The self-expandable CoreValve (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN
USA) stented prosthesis was exclusively implanted. Results: In
99.6% the valve was successfully deployed. At 30 days the
mortality and bleeding occurred in 2.6% and 3.5%, respectively,
irrespective of the approach. The long-term major adverse
cardiovascular events (MACE)and mortality rate were higher in
patients after transaortic TAVI (mortality - 31.3% at 1 year;
65.6% at 2 years in aortic, 14,7%; 24.1% in femoral and 13.1%;
24.7% in subclavian groups, respectively; p=0.043, MACE;
p=0.031). Conclusion: Compared to the femoral and subclavian
approaches, patients after transaortic TAVI have significantly
higher MACE and mortality rate up to 2 years.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI