Dual X-ray absorptiometry—cross-calibration and normative reference ranges for the spine: Results of a European Community Concerted Action

Abstract Bone density measurements by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine can now be made precisely, but there is no uniformity in reporting results and in presenting reference data. A European Union Concerted Action therefore devised a uniform procedure for cross-calibrating and standardizing instruments, using the European spine phantom (ESP) prototype. This phantom differs in a number of respects from the final version of the ESP. Eighteen centers in nine countries obtained 1619 records (1035 women) from Caucasian subjects, aged 20–80 years, drawn from normal populations. The DXA machines used were made by the Hologic, Lunar, and Norland companies. Highly statistically significant differences were evident between populations, both in apparent rates of bone loss with age and in the spread of values about the age-adjusted means. There were small residual differences in the results obtained with the three machine brands which could have been due to the relatively large between-center population differences we observed. The alternative or additional explanation that they were attributable, in part, to the design differences between the ESP prototype and the definitive ESP, which became available after this study was completed, was shown to be a valid possibility. Results from postmenopausal women reported in relation to the years that have elapsed since menopause showed reduced population variance when compared with conventional reporting in relation to age. After cross-calibration, the center with the highest age-adjusted normal density value averaged 23% more than the center with the lowest. It is therefore crucially important to select appropriate reference data in clinical and epidemiological studies. These results provide a basis for designing protocols for multicenter studies using currently installed densitometers. ( Bone 17:247–254; 1995 )