Midterm outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with prevention of type 2 endoleak by intraoperative aortic side branch coil embolization.

OBJECTIVE The midterm results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with aortic side branch coil embolization during EVAR was evaluated. METHODS Our center began coil embolization for all patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) with an inner diameter more than 2.0mm during EVAR since June 2015. When four or more LA were patent, coil embolization for LA with inner diameter 2.0mm or less was done. EVAR without aortic side branches coil embolization was performed for 59 patients prior to June 2015 (control group) and 79 patients underwent EVAR with coil embolization during EVAR (coil group). The success rate of coil embolization for IMA and LA was evaluated in coil group. The frequency of type 2 endoleak (T2EL), freedom from aneurysm sac expansion (5mm or more) rate and the rate of the aneurysm sac shrinkage (10mm or more) were compared between the coil and control groups. Additionally, multiple logistic regression analysis for all patients was conducted to analyze whether IMA patency and the number of patent lumbar artery at the end of EVAR were the risk factors of the aneurysm sac expansion of 5mm or more. RESULTS The success rate of IMA coil embolization was 96.4% and that of LA was 74.5%. Compared to the control group, the frequency of T2EL was significantly lower in coil group at 7 days (1.3% vs 60.4%, p<0.0001) and at 6 months (2.1% vs 38.2%, p<0.0001) after EVAR. The freedom from aneurysm sac expansion rate was significantly better in the coil group at 5 years (100% in coil group and 65.2% in control group, p=0.002). The rate of aneurysm sac shrinkage was significantly better in coil group (15.5% vs 2.0% at 1 year, 42.8% vs 6.3% at 2 years and 53.4% vs 17.8% at 3 years, p=0.0007). The risk of aneurysm sac expansion of 5mm or more was estimated to be 11 times greater when the IMA was patent, and 4.9 times greater when 3 or more LAs were patent at the end of EVAR. CONCLUSIONS When IMA was occluded and the number of patent LA became 2 or less by aortic side branch coil embolization during EVAR, favorable mid-term results were safely obtained and good long-term result could be expected with EVAR.