Evaluation of the colorectal wall in normal subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis using an ultrasonic catheter probe

Abstract Background: Ulcerative colitis is usually evaluated by barium enema and colonoscopy, methods of imaging that are limited to the mucosal surface. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the best modality for the evaluation of transmural changes in the bowel wall. We therefore evaluated the colorectal wall in normal control subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis using an ultrasonic catheter probe. Methods: Endoscopic ultrasound with a catheter probe was performed on 36 normal control subjects (36 examinations) and 72 patients (111 examinations) with documented ulcerative colitis. Results: In normal control subjects, the total wall, mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria were significantly thicker in the rectum than in the colon. There was no significant difference in the thickness of the colon and rectum among different age groups or between men and women. In ulcerative colitis, we classified the boundary of each layer into three patterns (smooth, irregular, and blurred) and then classified the wall into six types. In Matts grade 2 and 3 ulcerative colitis lesions, the total wall and each layer were significantly thicker than lower grade lesions and normal control subjects. For grade 1 and most of the grade 2 lesions, the boundary of each layer was smooth. In some of the grade 3 lesions, the mucosa-submucosa and submucosa-muscularis propria layer borders were abnormal. In all grade 4 cases, the mucosa-submucosa boundary was blurred. There was some correlation between the Matts grade and EUS findings except for Matts grade 3 lesions which had various EUS patterns. Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound with a catheter probe is a useful modality for the transmural assessment of the colorectal wall and, when used in conjunction with the many clinical and endoscopic parameters currently available, may contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative colitis. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:477-84.)