Survival Outcomes Associated With Female Primary Urethral Carcinoma: Review of a Single Institutional Experience

Abstract Background Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is rare, and standard treatment recommendations are lacking. We examined the variation in treatments and survival outcomes of female PUC at a single, tertiary referral cancer center. Methods Records of women with PUC referred to our multidisciplinary genitourinary oncology service between 2003 and 2017 were reviewed. Clinical, demographic, pathologic, primary and salvage therapy details, and overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were recorded. Survival outcomes were analyzed for the entire cohort, and cases of locally-advanced (≥ T2 tumor), non-metastatic PUC were evaluated according to treatment intensity. Multimodal treatment (cystourethrectomy + concomitant therapy) was compared with non-multimodal therapy. Contingency analyses and Kaplan-Meier estimates were performed. Results Thirty-nine women with PUC were identified. In total, median OS was 36 months (95% confidence interval, 10.6-61.4 months). Twenty-four had T3 to T4 disease, 12 were node-positive, and 3 had distant metastases. Histology included 22 adenocarcinomas, 11 urothelial, 5 squamous, and 1 neuroendocrine. Patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic disease (n = 25) had significantly reduced OS (36 vs. 99 months; P  = .016) and RFS (46 months vs. unmet; P  = .011) compared with patients with locally confined tumors. Approximately one-half of locally advanced cases were managed with multimodal therapy (4 with neoadjuvant therapy + cystourethrectomy, 8 with cystourethrectomy + adjuvant therapy, and 1 with chemoradiation + consolidative cystourethrectomy). Multimodal therapy had nonsignificant longer OS (36 vs. 16 months) and RFS (58 vs. 16 months), P > .05. Conclusions Locally advanced female PUC has relatively poor survival outcomes. Although we observed a nonsignificant interval improvement in survival with multimodality therapy, the treatment paradigm is inconsistent. Because it is a rare disease, collaborative multi-institutional studies are needed.