Hisian area and right ventricular apical pacing differently affect left atrial function: an intra-patients evaluation

Aims Right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing has adverse effects on left atrial (LA) function and may contribute to atrial arrhythmias. The effects of Hisian area (HA) pacing on LA function are still lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the left ventricular (LV) electromechanical activation/relaxation, systolic (S), diastolic (D) phases, and their effects on LA function during pacing from HA and RVA. Methods and results Thirty-seven patients with normal cardiac function underwent permanent HA pacing. In all patients, a RVA backup lead was added. The patients first underwent 3 months of HA pacing, followed by 3 months of RVA pacing. After each 3-month period, we compared by echocardiography: S–D LV electromechanical delay (S–D EMD), S–D intra-LV dyssynchrony, LV S–D phases, and their function evaluated by myocardial performance index (MPI) and mitral annular tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity ( E ′), pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP), and LA function (LA phasic volumes and their emptying fraction). Right ventricular apex compared with HA pacing increased S–D EMD ( P < 0.001) and intra-LV dyssynchrony ( P < 0.001). As a consequence, a significant longer LV isovolumetric contraction time ( P < 0.001) and LV isovolumetric relaxation time ( P = 0.05) were measured during RVA compared with HA pacing, whereas LV ejection time was shorter ( P = 0.033). Moreover, HA pacing resulted in significantly better MPI ( P = 0.039), higher value of E ′ ( P = 0.049), and lower PASP ( P < 0.001). Finally, RVA compared with HA pacing was associated to higher LA volumes pre-atrial contraction ( P = 0.001) and minimal volume ( P = 0.003) with reduction in passive emptying fraction ( P < 0.001) and total emptying fraction ( P = 0.005). Conclusion Hisian area compared with RVA pacing resulted in a more physiological LV electromechanical activation/relaxation and consequently better LA function.