Comparison Between ESC and Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis

Abstract Objectives The primary objective was to assess the value of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVE). Secondary objectives were: 1) to assess the reproducibility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT; 2) to compare its diagnostic value with that of echocardiography; and 3) to assess the diagnostic value of the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake Background 18F-FDG PET/CT has been added as a major criterion in the ESC 2015 infective endocarditis (IE) guidelines, but the benefit of the ESC criteria has not been prospectively compared with the conventional Duke criteria. Methods Between 2014 and 2017, 175 patients with suspected PVE were prospectively included in 3 French centers. After exclusion of patients with uninterpretable 18F-FDG PET/CT, 115 patients were evaluated, including 91 definite and 24 rejected IE, as defined by an expert consensus. Results Cardiac uptake by 18F-FDG PET/CT was observed in 67 of 91 patients with definite PVE and 6 with rejected IE (sensitivity 73.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 63.3% to 82.3%], specificity 75% [95% CI: 53.3% to 90.2%]). The ESC 2015 classification increased the sensitivity of Duke criteria from 57.1% (95% CI: 46.3% to 67.5%) to 83.5% (95% CI: 74.3% to 90.5%) (p  Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool in suspected PVE, and explains the greater sensitivity of ESC criteria than Duke criteria. However, 18F-FDG PET/CT also presents with important limitations concerning its feasibility, specificity, and reproducibility. Our study describes for the first time a new endocarditis criterion, that is, the presence of a diffuse splenic uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT.