High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Frontline Healthcare Workers in Northeast Brazil: A Respondent-Driven Sampling Approach

Background: The disparities in the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among frontline health care workers (HCWs) and the unique work circumstances are poorly documented for low-and middle-income countries. Methods: We assessed the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection, personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, PPE use, and accidents involving biological material among HCWs in the Recife metropolitan area, Northeast Brazil. Using respondent driven sampling, we included HCWs attending suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients from May 2020 to February 2021. Findings: We analyzed 1,525 HCWs (527 physicians, 471 registered nurses, 263 nursing assistants/technicians, and 264 physical therapists). Women predominated in all categories (81·1%). Nurses were older and had more comorbidities (hypertension and overweight/obesity) than the other HCWs. The overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 61·8% after adjustment for the cluster random effect, weighted by network, and reference population size. The independent risk factors for a positive RT-PCR test were being a nursing assistant (OR adjusted: 2·56), not always using all recommended PPE in routine practice (ORadj: 2·15), and reporting a splash of biological fluid/respiratory secretion in the eyes (ORadj: 3·37). Interpretation: The high risk of infection among HCWs reflects PPE shortages and younger, possibly less experienced, frontline HCWs. There were disparities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs, with nursing assistants being the most vulnerable, possibly due to their longer and frequent contact with COVID-19 patients. Funding Information: This investigation was funded by Health Technology Assessment Institute (IATS) and by MCTIC/CNPq/FNDCT/MS/SCTIE/Decit No 07/2020. Declaration of Interests: We declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: Providing electronic informed consent was mandatory to participate and access the questionnaire. The project was approved by the National Ethics Committee (CONEP; CAAE: 30629220.8.0000.0008).