Comparing Office, Central, Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Predicting Left Ventricular Mass

Abstract The blood pressure measurement method that more accurately predicts a left ventricular mass is controversial, and the evidence suggesting superiority of central over brachial measurements is contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship between the different clinic and out-of-clinic blood pressure measurements methods with left ventricular mass in patients who attended a specialised hypertension centre for a central blood pressure measurement. An analysis was performed on the correlations between left ventricular mass and central and brachial blood pressure measurements made in the clinic, and home, as well as 24-h systolic blood pressure measurements. A linear regression analysis was then performed to assess the independent relationship of each blood pressure measurement with left ventricular mass. The results on 824 treated and 123 untreated patients showed no significant differences between correlations, although home readings tended to have the best correlations. In regression adjusted models, for each 10 mmHg increase in systolic home blood pressure the left ventricular mass increased 10 g/m 2 (95% CI; 3.7-27, p =.01, adj R 2 0.38), and for 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure it increased 2.3 g/m 2 (95% CI 0.76-3.9, p adj R 2 0.15) in treated and untreated patients, respectively. The association of systolic blood pressure with left ventricular mass was better explained by home and 24-h ambulatory monitoring than to clinic-based measurements in treated and untreated patients, respectively. In the clinic, however, the central measurement was not superior to brachial blood pressure.