[Comparing Fiducial-Based and Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Registration for Frameless Stereotactic Brain Biopsy].

OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to compare fiducial-based and intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based registration for frameless stereotactic brain biopsy. METHODS Of 50 frameless stereotactic biopsies with the VarioGuide, 30 cases were registered as iCT based and 20 as fiducial based. Statistical analysis of the target registration error (TRE), dose length product, effective radiation dose (ED), operation time, and diagnostic yield was performed. RESULTS The mean TRE was significantly lower using iCT-based registration (mean ± SD: 0.70 ± 0.32 vs. 2.43 ± 0.73 mm, p < 0.0001). The ED was significantly lower when using iCT-based registration compared to standard navigational CT (mean ± SD: 0.10 ± 0.13 vs. 2.23 ± 0.34 mSv, p < 0.0001). Post-biopsy iCT was associated with a significant lower (p < 0.0001) ED compared to standard CT (mean ± SD: 1.04 ± 0.18 vs. 1.65 ± 0.26 mSv). The mean surgical time was shorter using iCT-based registration, although the mean total operating room (OR) time did not differ significantly. The diagnostic yield was 96.7% (iCT group) versus 95% (fiducial group). Post-biopsy imaging revealed severe bleeding in 3.3% (iCT group) versus 5% (fiducial group). CONCLUSION iCT-based registration for frameless stereotactic biopsies increases the accuracy significantly without negative effects on the surgical time or the overall time in the OR. Appropriate scan protocols in iCT registration contribute to a significant reduction of the radiation exposure. The high accuracy of the iCT makes it the more favorable registration strategy when taking biopsies of small tumors or lesions near eloquent brain areas.