Comparison of Long Term Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment Versus Bypass Surgery in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Patients with Long Femoropopliteal Lesions

Objective There are currently two treatments available for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI): open surgical bypass (OSB) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with/without stenting (PTA/S). The aim of this study was to compare short and long term outcomes between PTA/S and OSB in CLTI patients with long (GLASS grade III and IV) femoropopliteal disease. Methods This was a two centre retrospective study including all consecutive patients with CLTI undergoing first time lower extremity intervention at two distinct vascular surgical centres. Between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2018, 1 545 CLTI consecutive limbs were treated for femoropopliteal GLASS grade III and IV lesions at two vascular surgical centres. Using covariables from baseline and angiographic characteristics, a propensity score was calculated for each limb. Thus, comparable patient cohorts (235 in PTA/S and 235 in OSB group) were identified for further analysis. The primary outcomes were freedom from re-intervention in the treated extremity and major amputation. Secondary outcomes were all hospital complications among the two patient groups. Results Total overall complication rates were significantly higher in the OSB group (20.42% vs. 5.96%, p  Conclusion Bypass surgery seems to be superior to PTA/S for GLASS grade III and IV femoropopliteal lesions in patients with CLTI in terms of long term re-intervention rates, but with considerably higher rates of post-operative complications. A larger cohort of patients in currently ongoing randomised trials, as well as prospective cohort studies are necessary to confirm these findings.